| From: | Shawn Debnath <sdn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId() |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 17:53:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20180816175338.GA27190@60f81dc409fc.ant.amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:36:58AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >> That makes it sound like a mere optimisation, but since commit
> >> 8e18d04d4da user-created objects are not allowed to have OIDs below
> >> that threshold. So I propose the attached tweak.
> >
> > +1
>
> Looks good to me, too.
+1 and thanks for pointing to the commit which makes this a reality.
--
Shawn Debnath
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2018-08-16 17:54:25 | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Finzel | 2018-08-16 17:53:26 | Re: Repeatable Read Isolation in SQL running via background worker |