Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vimalraj A <vimal1805(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
Date: 2018-07-31 22:10:35
Message-ID: 20180731221035.GE2791@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:26:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Updated patch applied through 9.3:
> > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/260fe9f2b02b67de1e5ff29faf123e4220586c43
>
> This patch evidently broke buildfarm member jacana, although only
> in the 9.3 branch. It's been failing with
>
> Jul 28 23:22:29 Performing Consistency Checks
> Jul 28 23:22:29 -----------------------------
> Jul 28 23:22:29 Checking cluster versions ok
> Jul 28 23:22:30 The system cannot find the path specified.
> Jul 28 23:22:30
> Jul 28 23:22:30 The source cluster lacks cluster state information:
> Jul 28 23:22:30 Failure, exiting
> Jul 28 23:22:30 make: *** [check] Error 1

Well, that's interesting. I have a test script that upgrades all
version combinations of Postgres from 9.3 to head and it worked for me.
However, I now see that the tests for checking a live server were wrong,
and 9.3 must have a slightly different test than the others. Fixes
applied. Thanks for finding this so quickly.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-07-31 22:29:34 Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-07-31 22:00:21 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?