Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Vimalraj A <vimal1805(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4
Date: 2018-07-31 22:29:34
Message-ID: 13624.1533076174@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:26:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch evidently broke buildfarm member jacana, although only
>> in the 9.3 branch. It's been failing with
>> Jul 28 23:22:30 The system cannot find the path specified.

> Well, that's interesting. I have a test script that upgrades all
> version combinations of Postgres from 9.3 to head and it worked for me.
> However, I now see that the tests for checking a live server were wrong,
> and 9.3 must have a slightly different test than the others. Fixes
> applied. Thanks for finding this so quickly.

After poking around a bit more, I think the more likely explanation is
that 9.3 was still using the SYSTEMQUOTE macro in commands to be popen'd,
and you did not make that adjustment when back-patching into that branch.
Note the adjacent pre-existing invocation of pg_controldata:

snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), SYSTEMQUOTE "\"%s/%s \"%s\"" SYSTEMQUOTE,
cluster->bindir,
live_check ? "pg_controldata\"" : "pg_resetxlog\" -n",

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-31 22:34:54 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-07-31 22:10:35 Re: pg_upgrade from 9.4 to 10.4