Re: automating perl compile time checking

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: automating perl compile time checking
Date: 2018-06-11 18:33:27
Message-ID: 20180611183327.f2jpaz5k6uzvekxv@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Jun-05, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> > On 5 Jun 2018, at 16:31, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > The patch contains a simple script to run the checks. The code that finds perl files is put in a function in a single file that is sourced by the three locations that need it.
>
> +1 on centralizing the find-files function.

+1 on that. Why do we need to make the new find_perl_files file
executable, given it's always sourced? (I would have given a .sh
extension because it's a lib not an executable, but I suppose that's
just matter of taste; we certainly don't have a policy about it).

Looks fine to me either way.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-06-11 18:37:32 Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL Standard
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-11 18:31:11 Re: CF bug fix items