From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 11 feature count |
Date: | 2018-05-18 00:01:17 |
Message-ID: | 20180518000117.wpzmctfu3wfa6hpy@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-05-17 19:56:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 18 May 2018 at 11:29, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I regularly track the number of items documented in each major release.
> >> I use the attached script. You might be surprised to learn that PG 11
> >> has the lowest feature count of any release back through 7.4:
>
> > Interesting. I wonder how much of that drop over the past few years
> > can be accounted for by the fact that easier stuff tends to get
> > implemented first, and now we're all just left with the hard stuff.
>
> I don't think the "features" are all the same size, either.
> Procedures and JIT are both pretty major things ...
Yea. You could easily break down either feature into at least 10
sub-features that would independently be listed if they happend in
subsequent releases... I don't think counting items in the release
notes yields something particularly meaningful.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-05-18 00:11:24 | Re: PG 11 feature count |
Previous Message | Gavin Flower | 2018-05-17 23:59:58 | Re: PG 11 feature count |