Re: PG 11 feature count

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 11 feature count
Date: 2018-05-17 23:56:43
Message-ID: 15797.1526601403@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 18 May 2018 at 11:29, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I regularly track the number of items documented in each major release.
>> I use the attached script. You might be surprised to learn that PG 11
>> has the lowest feature count of any release back through 7.4:

> Interesting. I wonder how much of that drop over the past few years
> can be accounted for by the fact that easier stuff tends to get
> implemented first, and now we're all just left with the hard stuff.

I don't think the "features" are all the same size, either.
Procedures and JIT are both pretty major things ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2018-05-17 23:59:58 Re: PG 11 feature count
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-05-17 23:54:08 Re: PG 11 feature count