From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: perlcritic and perltidy |
Date: | 2018-05-08 17:06:42 |
Message-ID: | 20180508170642.GV27724@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> >
> > > - 'XLogRecPtr' => 'pg_lsn');
> > > + 'XLogRecPtr' => 'pg_lsn',);
> >
> > There's not much point adding the ',' unless you're also putting the
> > ');' on the next line, is there..?
> >
> > Or is that going to be handled in a follow-up patch?
>
> IMO we should classify this one as pointless uglification and move on.
I'm all for the change if we actually get to a result where the lines
can be moved and you don't have to go muck with the extra stuff at the
end of the line (add a comma, or remove a comma, remove or add the
parens, etc). If we aren't going all the way to get to that point then
I tend to agree that it's not a useful change to make.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-05-08 17:17:07 | Re: perlcritic and perltidy |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-08 17:02:51 | Re: perlcritic and perltidy |