| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs |
| Date: | 2018-03-14 08:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20180314084621.GA617@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:30:59PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Doesn't it make sense if we provide a buildtime-script that
> collects the function names and builds a .h file containing a
> function using the list?
>
> The attached perl script is a rush work of such script, which
> works at the top of the source tree. It just prints the function
> definition, does not generate a .h file.
>
> I haven't confirmed anything about it but I had the following
> output from the current master.
I quite like that idea actually. Please note that pl_handler.c declares
two more of them, so we may want a smarter parsing which takes into
account declarations of DefineCustom*Variable.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2018-03-14 09:02:51 | Re: Fixes for missing schema qualifications |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-03-14 08:45:18 | Incorrect comment for ExecProcessReturning |