Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Date: 2018-02-16 04:28:18
Message-ID: 20180216042818.GB1174@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:00:39AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hm, I'm not quite convinced by this. Seems to make testing a bunch of
> codepaths harder. I think it's fine to say that pg doesn't work
> correctly with them disabled though.

Well, for what it's worth that's one thing less to be forgotten when
implementing features related to parallel query. That's the lesson
88ef48c is telling us here, much unlikely anybody would disable it
though after an initdb.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-02-16 04:36:51 Re: Removing useless #include's.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-16 04:07:08 Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.