Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Let's remove DSM_INPL_NONE.
Date: 2018-02-15 18:00:39
Message-ID: 20180215180039.qbgjyfp7fc627y3e@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-02-15 19:58:57 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> As in the other threads[1][2], we have had several good reasons
> to remove DSM_IMPL_NONE in PG11. The attached patch doesn that.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+Tgmoa0e23YC3SCwB85Yf5oUTRyirV=Sq_rXYxaXABLdPpjoA@mail.gmail.com
>
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180214.103858.02713585.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp

Hm, I'm not quite convinced by this. Seems to make testing a bunch of
codepaths harder. I think it's fine to say that pg doesn't work
correctly with them disabled though.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-02-15 18:01:57 Re: spin.c includes pg_sema.h even if unnecessary
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-02-15 17:23:10 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.1