Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jim Ryan <jim(at)room118solutions(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader
Date: 2018-01-31 22:10:15
Message-ID: 20180131221015.GE3401@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:31:46PM -0500, Jim Ryan wrote:
> This looks great.  Thanks for working on it.

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2018-02-01 07:48:02 information_schema.applicable_roles behavior does not match documentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-31 22:00:54 Re: Trigger behaviour not as stated