Re: Trigger behaviour not as stated

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, ian(at)thepathcentral(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Trigger behaviour not as stated
Date: 2018-01-31 22:00:54
Message-ID: 20180131220054.GD3401@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:17:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:12:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > Oh, I am sorry. I was focused on the first part of the sentence and
> > > didn't notice your change to the second part. How is this attachment?
> >
> > Seems same as your previous version?
>
> OK, new vesion that uses "explicitly named" in both modified doc lines.

Applied and backpatched through 10, where the text was added.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-31 22:10:15 Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-31 21:55:03 Re: SPI not defined.