| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Raghavendra Rao J S V <raghavendrajsv(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup is taking more time than expected |
| Date: | 2018-01-13 16:41:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20180113164146.GF2416@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greetings,
* Raghavendra Rao J S V (raghavendrajsv(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I am asking in my previous mail as, Does the pg_basebackup depends on any
> of the postgres configuration parameters likes shared
> buffer/maintanance_work_memory etc? If yes, which are those configuration
> parameters, I need to take care/increase the value?
No, pg_basebackup doesn't really depend on any of those values (except
for things like max_wal_senders and whatnot to allow it to run at all,
of course).
> Please let me know what does this means.
>
> *Please don't top-post on the PG mailing lists.*
It means that you should reply in-line, like I'm doing, and remove text
that isn't relevant to your response.
> *How to get clarifications on my query?*
Either I've answered this above, or I don't know what you're asking
here.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-13 17:08:39 | Re: Postgres 9.4 using primary key index in almost all queries leading to degraded performance |
| Previous Message | Raghavendra Rao J S V | 2018-01-13 16:32:47 | Re: pg_basebackup is taking more time than expected |