From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
Date: | 2018-01-05 19:32:12 |
Message-ID: | 20180105193212.dnnz5asze64lgrfj@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
> > >
> > > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving)
> >
> > Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks translatability.
>
> Oh, you mean the 'if()' statement? If so, I will revert that and add a
> comment so I don't do it again in that place.
See 837255cc81fb59b12f5a70ac2a8a9850bccf13e0. I don't think adding
comments to every single place where this could be done (which is many
places, not just in pg_upgrade) is a good idea.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-05 19:37:58 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-05 19:31:51 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-05 19:37:58 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-05 19:31:51 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |