Re: money type's overflow handling is woefully incomplete

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: money type's overflow handling is woefully incomplete
Date: 2017-12-12 18:21:53
Message-ID: 20171212182153.wm7qrwfsfigciuck@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-12-12 11:01:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Long story short, I don't think anyone cares about this enough to
> > spend effort fixing it. I suspect the money data type has very few
> > users.

I'm unfortunately not so sure :(.

> Somebody did contribute the effort not too long ago to install that
> overflow check into cash_in. So maybe somebody will step up and fix
> the other money functions. I can't get too excited about it in the
> meantime.

I can't really either. But I think that kinda suggest we ought to rip
that code out in the not too far away future.

The background is that I was working on committing the faster (&
correct) overflow checks, and wanted to compile postgres with -ftrapv.
Some rudimentary cash (as well as pgbench, rel/abstime) fixes were
required to make the tests succeed...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2017-12-12 18:32:06 Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit
Previous Message Jeremy Finzel 2017-12-12 18:03:33 Backfill bgworker Extension?