Re: Migration to PGLister - After

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Migration to PGLister - After
Date: 2017-11-20 17:39:43
Message-ID: 20171120173943.GG4628@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greetings,

* John R Pierce (pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com) wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 6:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
> >on the wiki here:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce the
> >current version of which is also included below.
>
> A peeve on this new configuration:    if someone does a reply-all
> and sends both direct and list responses, the direct response ends
> up in my regular inbox because it doesn't have the List-ID...
> Previously, the direct reply would still have the Subject:
> [listname] that I filtered on, so it too would end up in my
> 'postgres' folder, where I want it.
>
> I realize why this was done, and yada yada, what a mess.

Indeed. Not much we can do about that, unfortunately. Subject is not
something we're able to change.

Personally, I've always had emails which cc'd me going into my inbox and
prefer it, but I can see the counter-argument. There is an option in
pglister to not receive *both*, but that means that you only get the
email which is sent directly to you and I realize you'd prefer the
opposite, but I don't see any way for us to address that while still
following the DKIM, et al, rules.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt 2017-11-20 17:41:53 unsubscribe
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2017-11-20 17:38:12 Re: Migration to PGLister - After