Re: Migration to PGLister - After

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Migration to PGLister - After
Date: 2017-11-20 17:38:12
Message-ID: 055fdb01-6cf3-00b2-8848-e9057de19857@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/20/2017 09:32 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 6:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
>> on the wiki here:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce  the
>> current version of which is also included below.
>
>
> A peeve on this new configuration:    if someone does a reply-all and
> sends both direct and list responses, the direct response ends up in
> my regular inbox because it doesn't have the List-ID... Previously,
> the direct reply would still have the Subject: [listname] that I
> filtered on, so it too would end up in my 'postgres' folder, where I
> want it.
>
> I realize why this was done, and yada yada, what a mess.
>

Yep, but that is why the list-id filter is bad advice (at least for me).
I filter on the list email address and it works flawlessly.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-11-20 17:39:43 Re: Migration to PGLister - After
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-20 17:36:48 Re: [GENERAL] Query Using Massive Temp Space