From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Migration to PGLister - After |
Date: | 2017-11-20 17:38:12 |
Message-ID: | 055fdb01-6cf3-00b2-8848-e9057de19857@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/20/2017 09:32 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 6:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
>> on the wiki here:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce the
>> current version of which is also included below.
>
>
> A peeve on this new configuration: if someone does a reply-all and
> sends both direct and list responses, the direct response ends up in
> my regular inbox because it doesn't have the List-ID... Previously,
> the direct reply would still have the Subject: [listname] that I
> filtered on, so it too would end up in my 'postgres' folder, where I
> want it.
>
> I realize why this was done, and yada yada, what a mess.
>
Yep, but that is why the list-id filter is bad advice (at least for me).
I filter on the list email address and it works flawlessly.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-20 17:39:43 | Re: Migration to PGLister - After |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-20 17:36:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Query Using Massive Temp Space |