From: | Raphael Hertzog <hertzog(at)debian(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |
Date: | 2017-11-07 15:06:02 |
Message-ID: | 20171107150602.yt7jrju2a2jhx6w4@home.ouaza.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Raphael,
>
> * Raphael Hertzog (hertzog(at)debian(dot)org) wrote:
> > Still I believe that this issue should be fixed in both sides. It's not
> > smart from PostgreSQL to call fsync() when it has not made any change.
>
> Why?
Because it's useless. Why call fsync() when you know that it doesn't do
anything?
And because I have just shown that doing this can have unexpected
side-effects in some specific conditions.
But this is really a matter of aesthetics and trade-offs. I don't know the
code. It might be difficult to track the fact that changes have been made.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-07 15:06:55 | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-07 15:01:16 | Re: Fails to work on live images due to fsync() on pg_commit_ts before doing any write there |