Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values)

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values)
Date: 2017-08-18 03:13:20
Message-ID: 20170818031320.GA4011786@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:22:07PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/14/17 12:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 8/13/17 15:39, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> >
> > I think there are up to three separate issues in play:
> >
> > - what to do about some preloaded collations disappearing between versions
> >
> > - whether to preload keyword variants
> >
> > - whether to canonicalize some things during CREATE COLLATION
> >
> > I responded to all these subplots now, but the discussion is ongoing. I
> > will set the next check-in to Thursday.
>
> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about
> what needs changing here. I will entertain concrete proposals about the
> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to
> be PG11 material), but in the absence of that, I don't plan any work on
> this right now.

I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
item. Are you?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-18 03:19:17 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-08-18 02:44:18 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6