Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values)
Date: 2017-08-19 03:08:37
Message-ID: 1ba4d696-3319-f6ee-704b-c065408cb59c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/17/17 23:13, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about
>> what needs changing here. I will entertain concrete proposals about the
>> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to
>> be PG11 material), but in the absence of that, I don't plan any work on
>> this right now.
> I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
> item. Are you?

Well, some people are not content with the current state of things, so
it is probably an open item. I will propose patches on Monday to
hopefully close this.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-19 03:23:31 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-19 02:55:38 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values