Re: Top posting....

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top posting....
Date: 2017-05-14 01:48:55
Message-ID: 20170514014855.GC808@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 01:43:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Absolutely. The point of quoting previous messages is not to replicate
> the entire thread in each message; we have archives for that. The point
> is to *briefly* remind readers what it is that you're responding to.
> If you can't be brief, you are disrespecting your readers by wasting their
> time. They've probably already read the earlier part of the thread anyway.

Totally agree, and I am seeing non-trimmed bottom posts more often on
the hackers list than I used to. I am thinking someone needs to start a
hackers thread about that.

Amen to the usability of the archives with no thread breaks --- I am
sure that was not easy.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Goodson 2017-05-14 09:43:07 Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 3 - libraries resolved, still can't compile :(
Previous Message Darren Duncan 2017-05-13 02:39:43 Re: PostgreSQL Portable for Linux