Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Date: 2017-05-01 21:44:50
Message-ID: 20170501174450.61626ddd3165b6c800089bae@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 1 May 2017 22:05:03 +0200
Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > There's a well-written article I saw recently that directly addresses
> > your question ... I'm too lazy to find it, but google will probably
> > turn it up for you.
>
> I tried to find it, but failed. Can you give me some keywords to find
> this well-written article?

I can't seem find it again. Sorry.

--
Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Korot 2017-05-01 22:08:39 Compatibility of libpg
Previous Message Bill Moran 2017-05-01 21:42:36 Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?