| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Delrue <thomas(at)epistulae(dot)net>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
| Date: | 2017-05-01 21:42:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20170501174236.aefbb83028cee12d04a3ead3@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 1 May 2017 22:02:15 +0200
Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> wrote:
> Leaving two things open:
>
> - blob storage
> - redis/caching
I've used Postgres for both of these purposes, and at the load
level we were experiencing at the time, it worked fine.
We later implemented Redis when our caching requirements exceeded
what Postgres could do in that capacity. We never switched to
anything else for blob storage, as Postgres was always sufficient.
--
Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moran | 2017-05-01 21:44:50 | Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |
| Previous Message | Sven R. Kunze | 2017-05-01 20:59:31 | Re: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future? |