Re: snapbuild woes

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58:12AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2017-04-12 11:03:57 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On 4/12/17 02:31, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > >>> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the postgres 10
> > > >>> release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very broken without
> > > >>> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know which ones
> > > >>> are essential and which may not be).
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't plan to
> > > >> wait for 2017-07.
> > > >
> > > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> > >
> > > I'm hoping for a word from Andres on this.
> >
> > Feel free to reassign to me.
>
> Thanks for volunteering; I'll do that shortly. Please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com