Re: snapbuild woes

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: snapbuild woes
Date: 2017-04-13 04:58:12
Message-ID: 20170413045812.GA2917375@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-12 11:03:57 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 4/12/17 02:31, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >>> But I hope you mean to commit these snapbuild patches before the postgres 10
> > >>> release? As far as I know, logical replication is still very broken without
> > >>> them (or at least some of that set of 5 patches - I don't know which ones
> > >>> are essential and which may not be).
> > >>
> > >> Yes, these should go into 10 *and* earlier releases, and I don't plan to
> > >> wait for 2017-07.
> > >
> > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > I'm hoping for a word from Andres on this.
>
> Feel free to reassign to me.

Thanks for volunteering; I'll do that shortly. Please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-04-13 05:00:26 Re: Logical replication and inheritance
Previous Message Noah Misch 2017-04-13 04:56:05 Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?