Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code
Date: 2017-01-20 21:12:47
Message-ID: 20170120211247.GY18360@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm. That's bad. I kind of wonder how sane it is to think that we
> > can invoke SQL-callable functions during a relcache reload, because
> > couldn't we be processing an invalidation in the context of an aborted
> > transaction?
>
> You're doing WHAT?

Uh. +1.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-20 21:25:18 Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-20 21:02:51 Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code