Re: make more use of RoleSpec struct

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: make more use of RoleSpec struct
Date: 2016-12-28 15:23:37
Message-ID: 20161228152337.GI18360@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Here is a small cleanup patch to make more use of the RoleSpec
> > struct/node throughout the parser to avoid casts and make the code more
> > self-documenting.
>
> This makes sense to me. I started to do this at some point when I was
> writing RoleSpec; eventually got annoyed about fixing the fallout (I was
> working to get somebody else's patch committed) and went back to how it
> is. Glad to see it done.
>
> The only functional issue might be the removal of the IsA() checks. If
> we don't cast any Node before passing it to any of those functions,
> there should be no problem because any misfeasance will be reported as a
> compile-time warning. Perhaps it's worth adding IsA() checks in loops
> such as the one in roleSpecsToIds().

Maybe inside of an Assert() though..?

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2016-12-28 15:25:00 Re: Hooks
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-12-28 15:11:41 Re: Reporting planning time with EXPLAIN