From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: make more use of RoleSpec struct |
Date: | 2016-12-28 15:23:37 |
Message-ID: | 20161228152337.GI18360@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Here is a small cleanup patch to make more use of the RoleSpec
> > struct/node throughout the parser to avoid casts and make the code more
> > self-documenting.
>
> This makes sense to me. I started to do this at some point when I was
> writing RoleSpec; eventually got annoyed about fixing the fallout (I was
> working to get somebody else's patch committed) and went back to how it
> is. Glad to see it done.
>
> The only functional issue might be the removal of the IsA() checks. If
> we don't cast any Node before passing it to any of those functions,
> there should be no problem because any misfeasance will be reported as a
> compile-time warning. Perhaps it's worth adding IsA() checks in loops
> such as the one in roleSpecsToIds().
Maybe inside of an Assert() though..?
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2016-12-28 15:25:00 | Re: Hooks |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-12-28 15:11:41 | Re: Reporting planning time with EXPLAIN |