Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers
Date: 2016-08-14 10:35:30
Message-ID: 20160814103530.GA4280@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 01:32:33PM +0200, Chris Travers wrote:

>>> My preference is stored procedures plus service locators
>>
>> Would you care to elaborate a little on the latter (service locators) ?
>>
>
> Sure. What I prefer to do is to allow for a (cacheable) lookup on the
> basis of some criteria, either:
> 1. Function name or
> 2. Function name and first argument type
>
> This assumes that whichever discovery criteria you are using leads to
> uniquely identifying a function.
>
> Then from the argument list, I know the names and types of the arguments,
> and the service locator can map them in. This means:
>
> 1. You can expose an API which calls arguments by name rather than just
> position, and
> 2. You can add arguments of different types without breaking things as
> long as it is agreed that unknown arguments are passed in as NULL.

Maybe I am a bit dense. Can you please give an example ?

Thanks,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2016-08-14 10:55:41 Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers
Previous Message Xtra Coder 2016-08-14 10:13:00 Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?