| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Protect a table against concurrent data changes while allowing to vacuum it |
| Date: | 2016-06-22 20:56:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20160622165657.47c4f7ee140cf57522cbac2f@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:20:38 +0000
Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:08 PM Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> > I am running PostgreSQL 9.5.
> >
> > CREATE TABLE t (id BIGINT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT);
> >
> > The constraint that the data must satisfy is `there is no more than 3
> > records with the same name`.
> >
> > I am not in control of queries that modify the table, so advisory locks
> > can hardly be of help to me.
> >
>
> Define a function which does a count of the rows and if count is 3 it
> return false if count is less it returns true.
An exclusion constraint might be a better solution.
--
Bill Moran
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick B | 2016-06-22 21:42:10 | Re: Help on recovering my standby |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-06-22 18:42:22 | Re: Postgres 9.5.2 upgrade to 9.6 |