Re: Timeline following for logical slots

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Date: 2016-05-02 19:18:47
Message-ID: 20160502191847.3bxl6iv3eqpbvgoq@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-05-02 16:12:53 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I pushed a fix to some comments, including the ones being discussed in
> this subthread, which should hopefully close things here.
>
> I'm now going to go over Craig's pg_recvlogical changes and the proposed
> for that problem.

- /* oldest LSN that the client has acked receipt for */
+ /*
+ * Oldest LSN that the client has acked receipt for. This is used as the
+ * start_lsn point in case the client doesn't specify one, and also as a
+ * safety measure to back off in case the client specifies a start_lsn
+ * that's further in the future than this value.
+ */
XLogRecPtr confirmed_flush;

This is the wrong way round. confirmed_flush is used if the client's
start_lsn is further in the *past* than this value.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-02 19:22:52 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2016-05-02 19:18:28 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?