| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Date: | 2016-05-02 14:21:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20160502142121.fn2y3walpebprccn@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-05-02 09:03:19 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Now to continue with the performance benchmarks. I'm pretty sure
> > we've fixed the problems when the feature is disabled
> > (old_snapshot_threshold = -1), and there are several suggestions
> > for improving performance while it is on that need to be compared
> > and benchmarked.
>
> If anyone thinks that the issue with the feature disabled is NOT
> fixed, please speak up! I'm moving the corresponding open item to
> CLOSE_WAIT status, meaning that it will be closed if nobody shows up
> to say that there is still an issue.
Well, I don't agree that the feature is in a releaseable state. The
datastructure is pretty much non-scalable, and maintained on the wrong
side (every read, instead of once in writing writing xacts). There's no
proposal actually addressing the scalability issues.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-02 14:32:28 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-02 13:24:56 | pgsql: Again update typedefs.list file in preparation for pgindent run |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-02 14:22:56 | Re: Refactor pg_dump as a library? |
| Previous Message | dandl | 2016-05-02 14:17:24 | Re: About subxact and xact nesting level... |