Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers
Date: 2016-04-29 18:44:04
Message-ID: 20160429184404.frmcvkbmg6y4pxym@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2016-04-29 15:27:15 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> If consensus is that we should completely forbid cross-posting, we can
> talk about that.

I find xposts rather useful. WRT committers vs. hackers thing, I'll
e.g. be far more likely to be able to keep up with committers than
hackers.

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-29 19:07:46 Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-29 18:27:15 Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-29 18:50:02 Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-04-29 18:36:54 Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0