Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2016-04-28 23:40:14
Message-ID: 20160428234013.GB11728@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 04:30:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-04-28 19:23:26 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
>
> If we do so, we should do it at a good bit earlier in the cycle imo.

Well, we talked about it in May of 2015, but didn't do anything. Was
there some big WAL user API change in this release that encouraged the
idea of the change?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-29 01:32:39 Re: pg_upgrade 9.6->9.6: column "amtype" does not exist
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-28 23:30:39 Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?