From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing the size of BufferTag & remodeling forks |
Date: | 2016-04-21 18:25:06 |
Message-ID: | 20160421182506.3zxoigyuantoa7ji@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-04-19 15:44:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > I've actually changed course a bit and I'm trying something different: A
> > two level structure. One hashtable that maps (RelFileNode, ForkNumber)
> > to a 'open relation' data structure, and from there a radix tree over
> > just the block number. To avoid having to look up in the hashtable
> > frequently there's a pointer in RelationData to a fork's radix tree.
>
> Is this going anywhere, or did you drop the subject altogether?
I've postponed working on it a bit, as it was becoming clearer that 9.6
wasn't a realistic target. I do plan to pick this up again once we're in
beta.
Any specific reason for asking?
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-21 18:45:16 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Inline initial comparisons in TestForOldSnapshot() |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-21 18:22:53 | Re: kqueue |