From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V16 |
Date: | 2016-02-08 14:54:16 |
Message-ID: | 20160208145416.hkrw5yvh7sepxft5@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Fabien,
On 2016-02-04 16:54:58 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't want to post a full series right now, but my working state is
> available on
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=users/andresfreund/postgres.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/checkpoint-flush
> git://git.postgresql.org/git/users/andresfreund/postgres.git checkpoint-flush
>
> The main changes are that:
> 1) the significant performance regressions I saw are addressed by
> changing the wal writer flushing logic
> 2) The flushing API moved up a couple layers, and now deals with buffer
> tags, rather than the physical files
> 3) Writes from checkpoints, bgwriter and files are flushed, configurable
> by individual GUCs. Without that I still saw the spiked in a lot of circumstances.
>
> There's also a more experimental reimplementation of bgwriter, but I'm
> not sure it's realistic to polish that up within the constraints of 9.6.
Any comments before I spend more time polishing this? I'm currently
updating docs and comments to actually describe the current state...
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-02-08 14:59:16 | Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-08 14:46:40 | Re: WAL Re-Writes |