Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Date: 2015-09-23 13:34:16
Message-ID: 20150923133416.GQ295765@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Personally I think Alvaro's position is unduly conservative: to the extent
> that plans change it'd likely be for the better. But I'm not excited
> enough to fight hard about it.

I don't really care enough. We have received some complaints about
keeping plans stable, but maybe it's okay.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-09-23 13:36:30 Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-23 13:29:09 Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work