Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work

> @@ -1210,8 +1211,14 @@ restart:;
> (void) SlruScanDirectory(ctl, SlruScanDirCbDeleteCutoff, &cutoffPage);
> }
>
> -void
> -SlruDeleteSegment(SlruCtl ctl, char *filename)
> +/*
> + * Delete an individual SLRU segment, identified by the filename.
> + *
> + * NB: This does not touch the SLRU buffers themselves, callers have to ensure
> + * they either can't yet contain anything, or have already been cleaned out.
> + */
> +static void
> +SlruInternalDeleteSegment(SlruCtl ctl, char *filename)
> {
> char path[MAXPGPATH];
>
> @@ -1222,6 +1229,64 @@ SlruDeleteSegment(SlruCtl ctl, char *filename)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Delete an individual SLRU segment, identified by the segment number.
> + */
> +void
> +SlruDeleteSegment(SlruCtl ctl, int segno)

Is it okay to change the ABI of SlruDeleteSegment?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services