| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Date: | 2015-08-28 15:39:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20150828153926.GG4857@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-28 12:32:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Hello Hackers
> >
> > How would you react if I provided a patch which introduces a CMake build
> > system?
>
> What's your motivation for doing so?
I definitely can see some advantages. Non-broken dependencies around
recursive make being a major one. But I'm also afraid it's a rather
large undertaking. There's a fair number of special kind of rules, and
we're probably not going to want to break pgxs for extensions.
I also have some doubts around the portability of cmake and it's
generated makefiles. We do support some odd platforms.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-08-28 15:41:04 | Re: AcquireRewriteLocks/acquireLocksOnSubLinks vs. rowsecurity |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2015-08-28 15:37:29 | Re: One question about security label command |