| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mitsumasa KONDO <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomáš Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: skipping pg_log in basebackup (was Re: pg_basebackup and pg_stat_tmp directory) |
| Date: | 2015-06-11 05:39:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20150611053907.GA30945@toroid.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2015-06-11 14:28:36 +0900, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> After spending the night thinking about that, honestly, I think that
> we should go with (2) and keep the base backup as light-weight as
> possible and not bother about a GUC.
OK. Then the patch I posted earlier should be sufficient.
-- Abhijit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-06-11 05:46:46 | Re: skipping pg_log in basebackup (was Re: pg_basebackup and pg_stat_tmp directory) |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-06-11 05:38:03 | Re: skipping pg_log in basebackup (was Re: pg_basebackup and pg_stat_tmp directory) |