| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-06-08 17:36:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20150608173611.GL133018@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > (My personal alarm bells go off when I see autovac_naptime=15min or
> > more, but apparently not everybody sees things that way.)
>
> Uh, I'd echo that sentiment if you did s/15min/1min/
Yeah, well, that too I guess.
> I think Andres's patch is just improving the existing mechanism so
> that it's reliable, and you're proposing something notably different
> which might be better, but which is really a different proposal
> altogether.
Fair enough.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoff Montee | 2015-06-08 17:40:25 | Re: Joins between foreign tables |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-08 17:33:31 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-08 17:43:36 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-08 17:33:31 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |