Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Date: 2015-06-08 17:33:31
Message-ID: 20150608173331.GE20772@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 2015-06-08 14:23:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Sure. I just concern that we might be putting excessive trust on
> emergency workers being launched at a high pace.

I'm not sure what to do about that. I mean, it'd not be hard to simply
ignore naptime upon wraparound, but I'm not sure that'd be well
received.

> (My personal alarm bells go off when I see autovac_naptime=15min or
> more, but apparently not everybody sees things that way.)

Understandably so. I'd be alarmed at much lower values than that
actually.

> > ---
> > Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
>
> I wonder if these notices are useful at all.

I only know that I'm less annoyed at reading a untrimmed/badly wrapped
email if it's sent from a mobile phone, where it's hard to impossible to
write a well formatted email, than when sent from a full desktop.
That's why I added the notice...

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-08 17:36:11 Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-08 17:33:17 Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-08 17:36:11 Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-08 17:33:17 Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1