| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ERROR: cannot GetMultiXactIdMembers() during recovery |
| Date: | 2015-05-18 16:48:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20150518164803.GP2523@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> Any chance to get this fixed in time for 9.1.16?
I hope you had pinged some days earlier. Here's a patch, but I will
wait until this week's releases have been tagged before pushing.
I checked 9.2, and it doesn't look like it's subject to the same
problem: instead of HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum, it uses
HeapTupleIsSurelyDead in the equivalent place. Still, I think it's
saner to apply the same bug because as Andres notes the problem might
still be present in pgrowlocks and who knows what else.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| multixact-in-recovery.patch | text/x-diff | 854 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-18 16:48:55 | How does MSVC's fetchRegressOpts() work at all? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-18 16:33:25 | Re: RFC: Non-user-resettable SET SESSION AUTHORISATION |