From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | John Siracusa <siracusa(at)mindspring(dot)com>, Postgres Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes |
Date: | 2004-03-07 03:46:57 |
Message-ID: | 20141.1078631217@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Just a suggestion, please use diff -c format, as it makes it easier for
> the folks who apply the patches to do so.
That's not just a suggestion ... patches that aren't in diff -c (or at
least diff -u) format will be rejected out of hand. Without the context
lines provided by these formats, applying a patch is an exercise in
risk-taking, because you can't be certain that you are applying the same
patch the submitter intended.
Personally I consider -c format the only one of the three that is
readable for reviewing purposes, so even if I weren't intending
immediate application, I'd ask for -c before looking at the patch.
There are some folks who consider -u format readable, but I'm not
one of them ...
BTW, patches really ought to go to pgsql-patches ... they're a bit
off-topic here.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-07 03:49:32 | Re: avg() for timestamp |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-03-07 02:50:52 | avg() for timestamp |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Teran | 2004-03-07 11:42:22 | speeding up a select with C function? |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-03-07 03:01:22 | Re: Fixed width rows faster? |