Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Date: 2014-09-04 15:10:43
Message-ID: 20140904151043.GG14037@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> +Background Reclaimer's Processing
> >> +---------------------------------
> >>
> >> I suggest titling this section "Background Reclaim".
> >
> > I don't mind changing it, but currently used title is based on similar
> > title "Background Writer's Processing". It is used in previous
> > paragraph. Is there a reason to title this differently?
>
> Oh, I didn't see that. Seems like weird phrasing to me, but I guess
> it's probably better to keep it consistent.

... or you can also change the other one.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2014-09-04 15:10:46 Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2014-09-04 15:04:39 Re: PL/pgSQL 2