Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-07-04 16:05:11
Message-ID: 20140704160511.GJ10574@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2014-07-04 21:02:33 +0530, ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + */
> > +static const struct config_enum_entry backup_block_compression_options[] = {

Oh, I forgot to mention that the configuration setting changes are also
pending. I think we had a working consensus to use full_page_compression
as the name of the GUC. As I understand it, that'll accept an algorithm
name as an argument while we're still experimenting, but eventually once
we select an algorithm, it'll become just a boolean (and then we don't
need to put algorithm information into BkpBlock any more either).

-- Abhijit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-04 17:43:46 Re: pg_xlogdump --stats
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-07-04 15:46:46 Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()