At 2014-06-29 21:55:24 +0300, emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com wrote:
>
> I will update the patch as returned with feedback
I don't think it's fair to mark this as returned with feedback without a
more detailed review (I think of returned with feedback as providing a
concrete direction to follow). I've set it back to "needs review".
Does anyone else want to look at this patch?
-- Abhijit