From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans |
Date: | 2014-06-30 16:57:40 |
Message-ID: | 11981.1404147460@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think it's fair to mark this as returned with feedback without a
> more detailed review (I think of returned with feedback as providing a
> concrete direction to follow). I've set it back to "needs review".
> Does anyone else want to look at this patch?
I offered a few comments. I think it might also be useful to try to
quantify the worst-case performance cost for this, which would arise
for a single-table query on a table with lots of indexes. Don't
have time for that myself though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-30 17:15:23 | Re: better atomics - v0.5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-30 16:54:10 | Re: better atomics - v0.5 |