Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4
Date: 2014-05-07 00:41:13
Message-ID: 20140507004113.GN30817@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 06:24:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 05:35:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> But I don't see the reason why we shouldn't expect ecpg's headers to
> >> conform to our layout rules.
>
> > I don't know who ecpg got in there. Let me know what you would like
> > done.
>
> What I'm suggesting is that, in HEAD only, you remove these exclusion
> entries:
>
> > /ecpg/include/(sqlda|sqltypes)\.h$
> > /ecpg/include/preproc/struct\.h$
>
> then redo the pgindent run (presumably only those three files will change)
> and make any necessary updates in the ecpg expected files.

OK, done. ecpg exclusion removed, pgindent rerun (it only changed
sqlda.h), and ecpg regression tests updated, all only in head.

> Note that it's just chance that the back branch updates didn't hit those
> three files already, since you said you weren't using the filter on them.

Right.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-07 02:11:22 pgsql: doc: Fix DocBook XML validity
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-05-07 00:39:34 pgsql: With ecpg exclusion removed, re-run pgindent for 9.4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-07 00:44:56 Re: tests for client programs
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2014-05-07 00:25:40 Re: bgworker crashed or not?