Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET

Uh, were are we on this? Is it a TODO?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 01:39:28PM +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been working on a patch for the above discussed
> functionalities. I made an array of int32s, one for each bucket in a
> hash table(the array is per hash table).
>
> I am using the hash value directly to set the corresponding bit in the
> bit field.Specifically:
>
> bitfield_orvalue = 1<<hashvalue;
> hashtable->bitFields[bucketNumber] =
> (hashtable->bitFields[bucketNumber]) |bitfield_orvalue;
>
> But,the hash values are way beyond this, and I admit that my choice of
> int32 as bitfield isn't correct here.
>
> The hash values are like:
>
> 1359910425
> 1359910425
> -1662820951
> -1662820951
>
> What should I be using for the bit map?
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> l'apprenant
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +