| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Wood <dwood(at)salesforce(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.3 reference constraint regression |
| Date: | 2013-12-18 16:50:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20131218165051.GE11006@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > I have to say, it makes me really uncomfortable to take such
> > shortcuts. In other branches we are doing liveliness checks with
> > MultiXactIdIsRunning() et al. Why isn't that necessary here? And how
> > likely is that this won't cause breakage somewhere down the line because
> > somebody doesn't know of that subtlety?
>
> I came up with the attached last night, which should do the right thing
> in both cases.
That one had a silly bug, which I fixed and pushed now.
Thanks for the feedback,
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-12-18 17:21:08 | Re: Dynamic Shared Memory stuff |
| Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2013-12-18 16:50:42 | Re: RFC: Async query processing |